If you’re interested in learning more about the transformative justice law project, check out this website: www.transparentjustice.
It’s pretty much the same as the original “deathloop” trailer, and the same as the main story trailer. The video features a brief but meaningful discussion of this project, with no evidence to back it up, but it doesn’t really show a lot of the actual details. This is the only real video I can find, and the story is pretty much just pure, action-oriented.
As a matter of fact, the project is basically a law school for all of the above. So, in a sense, its not really an action movie, it’s more like a law school where the students study legal theory and practice.
This is the part where you’re probably going to take out your cell-phone and start shooting the whole damn sky. Except it’s really hard to do in this world since you have to walk through the city. You can walk through your neighborhood, but you cant use your cell-phone. You can drive your car, but you cant use your cell-phone. The best you can do is use your cell-phone to take a few seconds to text your neighbor.
It’s not just the cell-phone that lets you take this thing on. You can also use the phone to text your friend or someone you are meeting for lunch, and that’s a great way to start a conversation.
Also, I just discovered that this project is a collaborative effort between Microsoft and the Flemish Government. Why in the world would I believe that? Because I’ve been to Brussels and I can’t find a single person there who is not excited to be using this idea to take down criminals and hold them accountable.
If we’ve learned anything since the first days of Google, it’s that you need to be able to create your own definition of justice. At a certain point, we just need a device that can do it and make it easier for us to do it. But at this point, having a device that can do it is probably not enough. The more important thing is having a society that is willing to actually use this new technology.
What I’m talking about is a sort of a “trans-legal” form of justice. Instead of going through a formal process like a trial, a defendant would be asked to agree to a trial by jury. By having that trial, the judge would then decide the defendant’s guilt or innocence. The jury would then decide if the defendant was guilty and if he was. In this way, the judge would be able to decide the defendant’s guilt or innocence without having to involve a jury.
How do you get a jury? When a defendant walks into a courtroom, the judge gives the defendant a few things: a witness, a lawyer, and a judge. These things will sometimes need to be done by the jury. As a result, the judge is more likely to be able to make more decisions on behalf of the defendants rather than having to find the defendant guilty. In other words, the judge will have to decide which lawyers he or she will hire for the hearing.