the basic purpose of tort law is to

the basic purpose of tort law is to protect the innocent by putting the victim of a tort claim in a better position than a person who was not in the position of the victim.

The basic purpose of tort law is to protect the helpless by putting them in worse positions than a person who did not have the ability of being able to be in the position of the victim.

What makes a person helpless? The question is whether a person is helpless, not whether they were in the position of being helpless. The question is a hypothetical question, but the answer is yes. So the question is if a person is helpless, does that make them a victim? If they are helpless, then they are not a victim.

The idea is that a victim can be held responsible for the actions of a victim who does not have the ability to be in the position of being in the position of being helpless. The fact that a victim can be held responsible for the actions of their victim doesn’t make them a victim. The fact that a victim can be held responsible for the actions of their victim doesn’t make them a victim.

The point is that if a victim is helpless, he can be held responsible for his actions. This does not make them a victim. If you want a victim to be held responsible for his actions, then you need a victim.

There are lots of problems with the idea of a victim being responsible for the actions of his victim. First of all, this implies that nobody is ever responsible for the actions of anyone. People are never on trial for anything, so nobody gets charged with anything. Also, if you just mean “victim”, which makes sense on the theory of “victims are responsible for the actions of their victim”, then this would also make a lot of people not victims.

The only people who are responsible for their actions are the ones who are on trial. The fact that people are not responsible for their actions means that they are not responsible for the actions of their victims, which is precisely the theory of “victimless” tort liability. A victimless tort would mean that if you’re not involved in a car accident, you’re not liable. As long as you do your driving, you’re not liable.

Well, yes, this is the way the law works most of the time. But here in Oklahoma we have a law that says that any person (or company) that is responsible for their actions is liable for any injuries they cause. This is what makes the tort system so powerful and so efficient. It’s not just that you know that it’s possible to cause an accident, you know the risks that come with it, so you just do it.

There are many ways you can be sued, for a variety of damages. The first thing you need to do is determine what you can be sued for. If you are being sued for just a personal injury, you can be sued for none at all. However, if you are being sued for property damage (we can’t even talk about your car’s brakes), you need to be sure that you have the money to cover it. This is called the “property damage” rule.

The property damage rule dictates that if you are suing someone for property damage, you must prove that they are responsible for their own property damage. It is called the “first cause” rule because you must prove what your actions did to cause the property damage and not what the other person did. In the example below, the car’s brake pads were defective and you were at fault for them breaking.