I got to the point where I was really frustrated with the show. I couldn’t get through any of it. I had to leave. The episode was called “Laws of the Universe” and it was just a really stupid episode. It seemed like a great premise, but it just didn’t work. I mean, the first episode was about all the laws of nature. How did that not help? It just didn’t work.
So that’s what happened. I mean, it was actually really stupid, but I thought I was going to complain about how stupid it was. I guess I felt the same way every time, because it was so stupid and stupid. I just wanted to leave and hope for the best.
The problem with Law and Order SVU is that it just doesn’t have a great premise for the story’s main characters. Despite its name, it is actually really stupid. The episode is titled Law and Order SVU season 8 episode 22 and it just looks like a police procedural. The basic premise is that an unsolved murder is set up in a small town and a detective wants to solve it.
Law and Order SVU is one of the most famous and well-known shows on television but the premise for its main character, Detective David Webb, is really stupid. He is a cop who has no clue what he is doing but is trying to find the person responsible for the murder of his partner. He’s also trying to find out why a man is stalking his wife and daughter.
It does feel a bit like one of those classic cop shows in which the lead characters are dumb but the show works because they are so bad at the things they do. But that’s not how it works here. The dumbness is that Webb is basically a noir version of Law and Order’s Lt. Pete Campbell. He doesn’t know what he is doing, but he wants to solve the murder and that’s all that matters.
Its still a mystery to me why this detective chose to solve it by killing his partner instead of by going after the man who murdered his partner. Its a bit of a cop show in one sense, but its also a bit of a cop show in the sense that its the kind of show that you watch when you are bored because it has a very high kill percentage. The only reason its not a hit is that the killer has a lot of personality.
I feel like a lot of people who watch this show are looking for something new that is a little more dark, but the twist is that this is the same detective that was initially supposed to solve the crime. What happened was that a young man was killed in a violent manner but because he was the only witness, they didn’t get much of a confession.
The fact that the killer was supposed to be innocent and this detective just found out he was guilty is a perfect example of how many people think they don’t have enough to go on. They think they have the right answer, but they don’t, so they will watch and see if the killer will confess or not.
This shows you that we dont really know anything about the crime, not only because the killer isnt a person we know, but because the witnesses arent people we know either. The killer has a reason that we dont know, and we don’t. The fact that he kills the only witness, as well as the fact that he has a motive that we dont know, is an example of how the “credibility” of the witness is in question.
Its the nature of crime that the witness will tend to lie. Its also the nature of criminal justice that the jury will tend to believe the victim’s testimony, even if it was not completely truthful. We see this with the case of the murder of the main witness in SVU season 5, who was a witness who was so honest that she would tell the truth about a lot of the things (e.g., the murder of her boyfriend) that she knew were true.