In the world we live in today, the law has become increasingly dynamic. If you’ve been reading this for awhile, you know that I’m a big proponent of the idea that the law is constantly being redefined. Today, as I write this, the Supreme Court has been considering the constitutionality of the law banning same-sex marriage (for now). This is the first time I am hearing the question of whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.
Same-sex couples are already legally allowed to marry, in several states. Same-sex marriage is already legal in Utah, which is why my response is a bit different. In many states, the question of whether gay couples should be allowed to marry is currently on the ballot and will probably be decided by the legislature. In Utah, the question has already been decided by voters (in 2004), and the legislature has already ruled on it.
The legislature has only decided that Utah has no problem with gay couples being able to marry. It’s still pending legislation in the courts though. While it is legal to marry a gay couple in Utah, it is not legal for gay couples to own their own business, and thus are unable to get married.
This is of course a generalization, but it is true that Utah has no problem with gay marriage or business ownership. That’s because marriage is not a legal union. It is a legal contract between two people that can be dissolved by the state of Utah.
I’m not sure if Utah is doing this because it feels like it will be more lucrative or what, but that’s not their decision to make. If this bill were passed, it would be a huge loss to Utah because it would be the only state in the country that prohibits the ownership of a business by a gay couple.
I agree in theory that Utah should pass this bill. I disagree with the idea that it would be a huge loss to the state. In fact, I think that it would actually be beneficial to the state. In my next life I will be a lawyer. I will become a partner with another lawyer in the firm I currently work for. I would be allowed to buy a business that was owned by gay couples.
The problem with a law that would allow gay couples to own a business is that it would be a “legalization” of discrimination. There is no real way to “legalize” discrimination in the legal system. It would be impossible to prove or even prove that a business owner was discriminating against a gay couple, especially if the owner is also a business owner.
The problem with legalizing discrimination is that it is illegal. Therefore, the only way to enforce it is to make it illegal. That makes it impossible to enforce it. To enforce it, you would have to go to the courts, which is almost impossible. The courts would have to understand that discrimination is illegal so they would be biased toward granting your request.
So what should a business owner do when they are faced with a gay couple? Obviously, you should not discriminate against gay couples in the workplace. However, if you do, you should not discriminate against gay couples in the court of law.
To make it illegal to discriminate against gay couples in the workplace is to go against the law, and that would be almost impossible. When you go to court, you are not going to have a gay couple. You will not have a gay couple with no evidence of any discrimination. You will not have a gay couple with no proof of the couple being gay. You will have a gay couple with no proof that they’re gay.