This law firm specializes in law enforcement. They have been in business for decades. We’ve owned a couple of law firms in the past, but we’ve never been able to be on the same page. They’ve been in business for a long time. They have been doing good law practice. They know what they’re doing and are going to do it right. They are committed to doing what they believe is best for the law.
I think we can all agree that their commitment to doing the right thing is what made them successful in the first place. So we cant help but feel a bit uncomfortable when they start to seem like the firm of the last decade. Although we do get some satisfaction from knowing that weve made a lot of noise about law and policy, its still not the same as feeling like weve done good work.
I think we can all agree that law and policy is not the same thing. It’s like a lawyer saying, “you should have gotten that citation.” Yes, I agree with you. But in this case, we are talking about the firm of the last 10 years. You are correct that they may not be the firm of the last decade, but their actions are and will be. They are committed to doing what they believe is best for the law.
This isn’t always the case. For example, the firm of the last decade did not spend the last two decades doing what they believed was best. They just did what they thought was best. And this is no excuse. What they did was wrong. But because they did it, they are now the firm of the last 10 years.
They are committed to doing what they believe is best for the law. They are committed to changing the law. They are committed to changing the law to better protect and maintain the law.
DAGO’s career has been in a constant state of change. In 1990 he was a young, unknown, unproven lawyer, who was trying to get his own firm off the ground. He was fighting to avoid the dreaded “bad apple” syndrome, which is when a new, inexperienced lawyer causes a downfall for a seasoned veteran. It seems that DAGO is also fighting his own version of the syndrome. He wants the “bad apples” to be eliminated.
d agostino has been trying to get a law firm off the ground since he was 16 years old. He has a few different strategies in mind, including the bad apple strategy, but he’s also been trying to create a more effective way of fighting the bad apples. He’s trying to figure out a way to apply more computer science to the law and make more effective tools to combat bad apples. He’s even tried to patent some of his ideas.
We’re not quite sure what to make of d agostino and his methods. He doesn’t seem to have much to lose and he sounds like he has a lot to gain right now. We are intrigued though because d agostino has been trying to create a law firm on this island for years.
To be fair, we have a pretty good idea of how we are going to make it.
I mean, why is this guy getting into a patent suit and trying to patent his ideas? He doesnt seem to be doing anything wrong. Just seems that im way too cynical for my own good.